I originally posted this on my blog at Abhishaken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm reading 'How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas' by David Bornstein. The book is a collection of stories and essays on social entrepreneurs; and a must read for anybody fascinated by social change. I'm on chapter 8, which is an essay titled, 'Role of the social entrepreneur'. Its very well written and I wish I could reproduce it. In this post I've written a few of my views on the essay and have quoted Bornstein contextually.
The main motive behind the chapter was to show how social entrepreneurs are hidden behind their path-breaking ideas and rarely given credit. Actually its not a matter of credit, but also that social entrepreneurs are not as well scrutinized or researched as the case with business entrepreneurs. While business entrepreneurs have been given due credit for their role in changing the economies, social entrepreneurs are yet to be recognised as important forces of societal change. This is because sociologists consider factors driving social change- demographics, technology, economics, political processes- but do not consider the role of a 'charismatic leader'. In social innovation, ideas are more valued than people. People are just audience and are considered to have minimal role in an idea's successful propagation.
Such a thought would not fly for a second in the world of business, because its been proven over and over again that people driving ideas are more important than ideas. An idea with a great prospect will fail to reach its true potential if not fanatically pursued by a passionate and determined leader.This reasoning holds true in the social entrepreneurship world too.
A contemporary example will be Al Gore for 'Global warming' (personally, I think his picture is biased and very distorted. But thats another story.). His main role was that of an evangelist, a whistle blower or a lobbyist. He's made the US and Europe, frantic and paranoid about global warming. Thats no mean task. I think he's done more, than any scientist could have with research statistics.
Bornstein says, "An idea is like a play. It needs a good producer and a good promoter, even if it is a masterpiece. Otherwise the play may never open; or it may open but, for lack of an audience, close after a week." Ideas need champions and this is especially true for ideas which threaten status quo and go against all traditional wisdom or norms. Bornstein quotes James O' Toole from the book, 'Leading Change: The Argument for Values-Based Leadership', "The major factor in our resistance to change is the desire not to have the will of others forced on us." So if ideas need to take root as concrete realities, they'll need an obsessive, bullheaded tyrant with motivation to drive, persuade, cajole or inspire others into accepting the idea and its prospects.
Today when we try looking at various major social change that were once revolutionary and today, seem only logical, there was certainly one leader/entrepreneur who ignited the change. I can think of dowry abolition, sati abolition, widow remarriage, etc all being pioneered by various personalities like Ram Mohan Roy, Dayanand Saraswati, Babasaheb Ambedkar, etc. The fact though is, there's hardly any literature on scrutiny of their methods employed to reach their targets. Its probably because all the above people were praised as saints or mahatmas, one beyond any comparison with normal humans. In Christianity all the saints were almost certainly just proponents of great positive social progress and not really 'Holy' in the strictest terms. Since their motives were so selfless, their methods of achieving them haven't been recorded. It so appears that even though social entrepreneurs were identified and glorified much before business entrepreneurs (who were first identified in 'The Wealth of Nations' by Adam Smith in 1776), there's hardly any popular study on their methods.
I hope you read 'How to Change the World'', for essays on some contemporary entrepreneurs, who are Steve Jobs and Bransons of the social world. And if the world is lucky, you'll decide to change the world too.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Don't keki see the part about inconvenient truth being distorted. But yes on a serious note, I see your point. Social entrepreneurs arent given as much credit probably because they dont feature as much in mainstream media so frequently as do other tycoons.
Rishabh Kaul
Sunday, April 06, 2008 1:16:00 AMHey.
Not sure if their methods are not scrutinized, but they are definitely criticized :)
I don't think this is a problem typical of social change-leaders... it is often that we look at a person rather than his/her contribution while making a judgment.
Chinmay Kulkarni
Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:29:00 AMTravel Foodie
Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:23:00 PMHi PILANIAN...
Nice efforts!!!!!
Keep going........
Plz do visit on my blog & show your presence over there by leaving a comment on posts.If you want,You can also provide a link to my blog from your blog.
my blog:- http://neeraj4frnz.blogspot.com/
Thanx!
Travel Foodie
Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:28:00 PMTravel Foodie
Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:29:00 PMPlease one more post about that.I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect
cheap viagra
Friday, October 21, 2011 4:24:00 PMFantastic information.
Elliott Broidy
Friday, December 14, 2012 11:55:00 PM